Navigating the Storm: Lessons from Nike on Managing Difficult Top Performers

The best aren’t getting better on their own, they’re getting better because they are being coached.

The relationship between Phil Knight, co-founder of Nike, and Rob Strasser, one of Nike’s most influential early executives, represents a crucial dynamic in the company’s early success and offers valuable insights into managing high-performing but challenging employees. Strasser, originally hired as an attorney in 1972, quickly rose to prominence within the company due to his keen business instincts and natural leadership abilities. His aggressive, outspoken style often put him at odds with the more reserved and visionary Phil Knight, yet the tension between them fuelled Nike’s rapid growth during its formative years. Rob Strasser was an integral figure in Nike’s ascent to becoming a global sportswear giant. Although he initially came on board as legal counsel, Strasser’s talents extended far beyond the law. He had a sharp business mind, strong negotiation skills, and an innate ability to understand branding and marketing. These skills made him indispensable as Nike grew from a small running shoe company to a global powerhouse.

Strasser’s most notable achievements at Nike included his role in orchestrating some of the company’s most high-profile endorsement deals, particularly the signing of basketball legend Michael Jordan in 1984. This deal, which resulted in the creation of the Air Jordan line, became one of the most iconic and profitable partnerships in sports marketing history. Strasser understood the cultural power of athletes and the ability of a single sports star to elevate a brand’s status, and he leveraged this insight to help Nike dominate the global sports market.

The relationship would, as one. would expect, broke down many years later with Strasser doing what no Nike employ should do and left to join rival Adidas. But for us, the relationship Between these two powerhouses is full of incredible lessons on management and relationships, so of which I have outlined below.

Managing Rolling Thunder

While Strasser’s boldness and intensity helped drive Nike’s rapid growth, his personality often clashed with Phil Knight’s quieter, more strategic leadership style. Knight, as described in his memoir Shoe Dog, was a visionary leader focused on long-term goals, growth, and stability. His management style was methodical and hands-off, preferring to empower his executives to take charge in their respective areas of expertise. However, Knight’s tendency to avoid direct confrontation and his reluctance to engage deeply in interpersonal conflicts led to tension with Strasser, whose more abrasive, hands-on approach often put him at odds with other members of Nike’s leadership team.

Outlined in his memoir Shoe Dog, Phil Knight’s management style can be characterised as visionary but often hands-off, preferring to empower his executives to take charge in their respective areas of expertise. However, this then allowed strong personalities like Rob ‘Rolling Thunder’ Strasser to thrive. However, Knight’s tendency of avoid direct confrontation and his reluctance to engage deeply in interpersonal conflicts led to tension with Strasser, whose more out-going, abrasive and hands-on approach often put him at odds with other members of Nike’s leadership team. So how did Mr.Knight handle it?

Here’s the lessons you can learn from Knight vs Strasser:

1. Empower High Performers with Clear Boundaries

Strasser thrived when Knight gave him the freedom to operate independently, which led to groundbreaking marketing deals like the Air Jordan partnership. Leaders today should recognise the power of autonomy for talented team members. High performers often excel when they have the freedom to innovate, take risks, and push boundaries.

Application:

• Trust and autonomy: Empower key team members by giving them ownership of significant projects. Let them know you trust their judgment and encourage them to take calculated risks.

• Define boundaries: Clearly set expectations and communicate the limits of that autonomy. Ensure they understand that while they can innovate, they must also align with the team’s overall goals and values. Regular check-ins can keep autonomy balanced with team cohesion.

2. Like Battling A Storm, Address Conflicts Early and Head On

Knight’s reluctance to confront Strasser’s abrasive nature allowed internal tensions to grow, eventually leading to Strasser’s departure. In today’s workplaces, avoiding difficult conversations can lead to resentment and team dysfunction. Something that can’t be sustainable for high performing teams.

Application:

• Create feedback loops: Encourage a transparent environment where concerns can be voiced early. Provide constructive feedback frequently, ensuring that even strong performers understand how their actions affect the team. At the same time allow your team to give you feedback on how you can aid them in trying to achieve goals.

• Don’t avoid tough conversations: When a high-performing team member’s behavior becomes disruptive, address it head-on. Like taking a boat into a storm, you can’t turn to the side and try and outrun it. Engage in clear, respectful dialogue to resolve issues before they snowball into larger problems. This shows that you value both individual performance and team harmony.

3. Balance Loyalty and Change

Knight’s loyalty to Strasser was tested when Strasser began to feel marginalised. Knight hesitated to intervene or make changes, which ultimately contributed to Strasser’s departure. Leaders must balance their loyalty to top talent with the broader needs of the organisation.

Application:

• Evaluate performance holistically: High-performing employees may deliver exceptional results, but assess whether their impact on team morale, culture, and long-term strategy is positive. Leaders should support their star performers, but not at the expense of others or the company’s vision. As Sir Alex Ferguson was famous for saying “No one is bigger than the team".

• Be proactive about change: If a high performer’s behavior negatively affects the team, don’t delay making necessary adjustments. Change might mean reassigning roles, setting stricter guidelines, or—if necessary—parting ways with the individual for the greater good of the organisation. Whatever you decide to do, do it with meaning and vigour, setting boundaries immediately. If you don’t, you may run the risk of the individual undermining you.

4. Maintain Strong Communication and Empathy

Knight’s emotional detachment and lack of direct engagement with Strasser contributed to Strasser’s eventual dissatisfaction. Leaders need to balance their vision with empathy and relationship-building to retain key talent and keep them engaged. This also goes for the wider staff and not just your top performers, people thrive off relationships. Even if it’s against your personality, the occasional conversation about their family or hobbies in a positive way goes a long way. We’re all human after all.

Application:

• Build relationships: Strong leaders take the time to nurture relationships with their top performers and staff, showing interest in their personal and professional development. Maintain open lines of communication, ensuring they feel valued and connected to the company’s broader mission.

• Provide vision and purpose: Continuously remind your team members, especially high performers, of their role in achieving the company’s vision. Feeling connected to a larger purpose helps employees stay motivated and aligned with the company’s goals.

5. Know When to Let Go

Despite Strasser’s significant contributions, his departure allowed Nike to rebuild its internal culture and refocus. Sometimes, difficult employees, even those who produce great results, become liabilities if their presence begins to erode team morale and collaboration.

Application:

• Recognise when behavior becomes toxic: No matter how talented a team member is, if their actions start to damage the team’s morale or create friction, it may be time to consider parting ways. Leaders must prioritise the overall health and culture of the team over any one individual’s performance.

• Use exits as opportunities: If a disruptive but talented individual leaves, take it as a chance to reassess and improve the team’s culture. Focus on promoting collaboration, fostering new ideas, and reinforcing a positive environment where others can thrive.

Managing high-performing, difficult employees can be one of the most challenging aspects of leadership. However, by taking a balanced approach—empowering talent while addressing conflicts early, balancing loyalty with change, communicating clearly, and knowing when to let go—leaders can maximise both individual and team success. Each of these steps contributes to creating a team environment where innovation and high performance can flourish without undermining the harmony and culture necessary for sustained success.

By adopting these lessons, leaders can ensure their teams remain agile, focused, and aligned with long-term goals, while still nurturing the unique strengths of their top performers.

Allow Us To Become Your Coach.
Join Our Coaches Coach Programme.